It was 1st period, and the class was Algebra I. I put he following on the board:
– 3² = A) –6 B) 6 C) –9 D) 9
Sadly of the 30 students 28 chose D, and 1 chose C, and 1 chose A.
I then asked 3 of them to read the problem out loud. They all said,
"negative 3 squared"
This is what they were saying (–3)², or –3 the quantity squared.
This is why 28 of them were incorrect by sign and another has no idea what
an exponent does. One of them was correct, because we know the answer is
C. This is why I strongly suggest that we teach our students to call this sign
"–", "the opposite of". Now read the problem.
"the opposite of", 3 squared
The value of 3 squared is 9, and its opposite is –9.
This was a lead in to the question what is;
– x²; x = – 5 or x = 7
the opposite of (–5)² or the opposite of (7)²
x = – 25 or x = – 49
I hope these comments will help.
Thursday, January 26, 2012
Monday, January 9, 2012
SQUARING A 3–DIGIT NUMBER
teachers, even Middle School, will not be interested in my last blog, however
why stop there. Let's look at squaring a 3–digit number.
Last time it was: (a + b)(a + b) = a² + 2ab + b²
This time we have: (a + b + c)(a + b + c) =
a² + ab + ac + ba + b² + bc + ca + cb + c² =
a² + 2ab + b² + 2bc + c² + 2ac
So, when we look a number like 426, we need to look at it as
400 + 20 + 6 = 426
Square it: (400 + 20 + 6)(400 + 20 + 6)
We only need to use our counting digits, 4, 2, 6, with the help
of our zero to answer our question.
a = 400, b = 20, and c = 6
Thus, 400² + 2(400)(20) + 20² + 2(20)(6) + 6² +
2(400)(6)
1. 400² = 160000
2. 2(400)(20) = 16000
3. 20² = 400
4. 2(20)(6) = 240
5. 6² = 36
6. 2(400)(6) = 4800
Grand total is 181476
You may not be able to do something like this in your head
without a great deal of practice, but what if the number you
were squaring had a zero in it, like 403, or 260.
In 403 the b value would be 0, and the only therms in the formula
you would need would be a², 2ac, and c²
400² = 160000
2(400)(3) = 2400
3² = 9 TOTAL = 162409
260² = 200² + 2(200)(60) + 60²
= 40000 + 24000 + 3600
TOTAL = 67600
These last two examples, with practice, you can do in you
head and will show you how to use zeros correctly
when multiplying. I find that these kinds of mental
practices improve the mind. These will work well as
warm–up problems in the morning, or at the beginning
of any Math class.
Friday, January 6, 2012
SQUARING A 2-DIGIT NUMBER
Remember those first days of multiplying? We memorized our
2's, 3's, 5's, 10's, and struggled with our our 7's. If you do, you
are much younger than I, but then again, except for the baby–
boomers, everybody else is.
After memorizing everything from 1 x 1 = 1 to 12 x 12 = 144
we began to multiply things like
345 x 8 = 2760
Or did we think
(345 x 10) – (345 x 2) =
3450 – 690 = 2760
I know the second method was never mentioned, however I
thought it might be a good lead into what I am about to tell
you. That chart you memorized had a diagonal. These were
the perfect squares.
Why stop at 12 x 12 = 144. What if we could square any
2–digit number in your head. You might not think that it
would come in handy, but it gives you ideas about how you
can manipulate numbers to make what you are doing easier.
What is 93² or 93 x 93.
Well it is 8649, and I did not need a calculator to know it.
I simply added 8100 + 540 + 9 in my head.
Say what?
Well, you need to look at the problem as;
(90 + 3) (90 + 3)
and multiply every number in the 1st parenthesis by each
in the 2nd parenthesis.
90 x 90 = 8100
90 x 3 = 270 (twice) which makes 540
3 x 3 = 9
Thus, 8100 + 540 + 9 = 8649
You have to know how zeros work, but otherwise you are
just multiplying 9 x 9, 3 x 9, and 3 x 3.
It all comes from Algebra, and the F–O–I–L system.
Lets try 67 x 67, or (60 + 7)(60 + 7)
60 x 60 = 3600
60 x 7 = 420
7 x 60 = 420
7 x 7 = 49/ 3600 + 840 + 49 = 4449
With practice you can do these in your head.
Sunday, January 1, 2012
THE NEW YEAR
Its January 1st, 2012. My dad died four years ago today, and he was the
last of his generation in our family. I miss him, like I miss my mom who
died 3 years before him. But as we all march towards our own end, we are
looking at a year that for many brings big questions.
What about 12-21-12 and the end of the world. The alignment of our
planets with the center of our galaxy. The Mayans said it, so we should
all believe it. It truly amazes me what we believe, and what we spend
our whole lives trusting in. Two things that I do know, on 12-22-12
1. 40% of 250 will still be 100
2. The firs derivative of 5X³ will be 15X²
Math will not change, 1 will still be less than 3, and ∏ will be a
transcendental number 3.14159265. . .. Here we are on this tiny
little planet, in a universe of billions of galaxies, in a galaxy of
billions of stars, and most of us believe that we are the most
intelligent in the universe, and that one "god" did it all. Many of
us spend our entire life worrying about the next life time, when
we need to get along in this life time, and are not doing such
a great job.
I am not saying that we should not have our beliefs, but they
should not destroy our ability to get along with each other.
So as this year begins, let us strive to get along better, and
recognize what must be true, and spend less time debating
what might be true.
Friday, December 23, 2011
ANOTHER LOOK AT INTEGERS
I think what sparked my reason to look at this again was a
resent visit to my bank. I asked them for our balance after
a deposit, and then came home. I gave that information to
my incredibly copious spouse, who has been the guardian
of our check book for the last 40 years. The gap between
their amounts was more than I could understand. Somehow,
had a positive become a negative somewhere, and if so, this
could be a big mess.
Imagine you had a deposit of $500, but in your check book
recording you subtracted. You would be off by $1000. The
simple idea of adding integers seams to be such a problem
for so many. It is all about getting back to zero. If I earn
$200, but have $200 in bills to pay, when I am done I have
no money at all.
All we need ask now is which came first, my earnings or
my bills.
$200 + (–$200) = 0 or
(–$200) + $200 = 0
Why is this confusing?
Students know that 5 + 4 = 4 + 5, don't they?
What are we not being clear about?
Perhaps we just do not explain ourselves. Let me show
you what I mean.
We start with our digits 0 – 9 and we have hundreds
of worksheets with 7 + 2 = __ and 5 + 1 = __ .
Most of our students fill in the blanks, with little or
no retention, because all they do is stare and write
a number. Where it goes in those fine minds is
anyone's guess.
Try having them write the entire problem and the
answer with the = sign. Now their minds have the
whole story to place somewhere. Even better,
7 + (+ 2 ) = __ Read as: 7 + a positive 2 = 9
Then when they get to SUBTRACTION
7 + (–2 ) = __ Read as 7 + "the opposite of" 2 = 5
On the other side of zero
–7 + (– 2) = __ Read as "the opposite of" 7
+ "the opposite of" 2 = – 9
and with SUBTRACTION
–7 – (– 2) = __ Read as "the opposite of" 7
"the opposite of the opposite of 2 = – 5
When we add we go away fro zero, and when we
subtract we head back to zero, from either side.
I believe it is truly important that students see
integers from Kindergarten. They need not be
a surprise. We do not have to work with them,
but letting them know they are there will save
a great deal of anxiety.
Friday, December 9, 2011
SUBTRACTION WITH ZEROS
We have all been in class when the following problem was put on the board.
5003
– 1468
We remember that we cannot take 8 away from 3, so we have to borrow, or
REGROUP in todays vernacular. Thus, our 0's become a 9, our 5 is reduced
to 4 and off we go. But, why do we do that? Our 0's become 9's, really?
That's cool, we get 9 out of nothing. Oh, hold on there cowboy!
Look at this a different way.
5000 + 0 + 0 + 3
– 1000 + 400 + 60 + 8
Now the 3 needs an extra 10 to be 13, but 5000 can only hand out
1000's. Thus, we will drop off 900 in the hundreds place, 90 in the
tens place and the ones place only gets 10 leaving the following.
4000 + 900 + 90 + 13
– 1000 + 400 + 60 + 8
As we see, by expanding the numbers we get a clearer understanding
of what is happening. I hope you feel better about those 9's now.
Friday, November 25, 2011
Palindromic Numbers and Companions
Many years ago I came across a method for practicing your addition
facts and having fun at the same time. It all has to do with
PALINDROMIC NUMBERS.
A Palindromic number is a numbers that looks the same backwards
and forwards; 101, 232, 5445, 63436.
If a number is Palindromic then it is its own companion, but if its
not then we need to figure it out. We start with 3–digit numbers,
and as you saw above 101 and 232 are already Palindromic. But what
about a number like 117. Sense it is not Palindromic we reverse the
number and add them together.
117
+ 711
828 Thus: 828 is the companion of 117.
What about 536
536
+ 635
1171 Not Palindromic so we do it again.
1171
+ 1711
2882 Thus: 2882 is the companion of 536
Now try 468
468
+ 864
1332
2331
+ 1332
3333 Thus: 3333 is the companion of 468
Last we will look at 579
579
+ 975
1554 Try again
1554
+ 4551
6105 Try again
6501
+ 1056
7557
We found the Companion 7557
If your class works on all of the 3–digit numbers up to 999, you will
find them being able to add faster. As they get into them, they will find
some that take as many as 15 steps. Also, when you see common
companions look back at the numbers and see how they relate.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)